angular $q vs bluebird (v19)

Revision 19 of this benchmark created on

Description

Simple comparison of promise creation and resolution between Angular's $q, bluebird, and native ES6 Promise (only in Chrome and FF).

Preparation HTML

<script>
window.NativePromise = Promise;
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.2.19/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/bluebird/1.2.2/bluebird.min.js"></script>
<script>
angular.module('app', []).run(['$q', '$rootScope', function($q, $rootScope) {
  window.$q = $q;
  Promise.setScheduler(function (cb) {
            $rootScope.$evalAsync(cb);
        });
}]);
</script>
<div ng-app="app"></div>

Test runner

Ready to run.

Testing in
TestOps/sec
Angular Promise instantiate and resolve
// async test
var d = $q.defer();
d.promise.then(function() {
  deferred.resolve();
});
d.resolve('foo');
 
ready
bluebird instantiate and resolve
// async test
var p = new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
  resolve('foo');
}).
then(function() {
  deferred.resolve()
});
ready
Native
// async test
var p = new NativePromise(function(resolve, reject) {
  resolve('foo');
}).
then(function() {
  deferred.resolve()
});
ready

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.