BULL vs JQeury vs SeXHR (v6)

Revision 6 of this benchmark created on

Description

This benchmark tests the performance of BULL, JQuery and SeXHR.

I was told that SeXHR is very small and smart and thus very fast. This test proves, once again, that BULL is faster than any other AJAX library.

Preparation HTML

<script src="//doknow.me/bull-min.js"></script>
<script src="//doknow.me/SeXHR.min.js"></script>
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script>

Setup

var my_bull = new bull();
    var xhr = new sexhr;

Test runner

Ready to run.

Testing in
TestOps/sec
BULL 12.2
my_bull.request('/test.php', 'action=test', 1,
  function() {}, 1000, function() {});
ready
JQuery (Final)
$.post('/test.php', {
  action: 'test'
});
ready
SeXHR 1.7.1
xhr.req({
  url: '/test.php',
  method: "post",
  body: 'action=test',
  success: function(res) {

  },
  error: function(err) {

  }
});
ready
jq
var data = { 'foo':'foo' };
$.when(
$.post('/test.php',data),
$.post('/test.php',data),
$.post('/test.php',data),
$.post('/test.php',data),
$.post('/test.php',data),
$.post('/test.php',data),
$.post('/test.php',data),
$.post('/test.php',data)
).done(function(){});
ready

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.

  • Revision 1: published by George Delaportas on
  • Revision 2: published by George Delaportas on
  • Revision 3: published by Web Nerd on
  • Revision 4: published by George Delaportas on
  • Revision 5: published by Lord Dooku on
  • Revision 6: published on