Underscore.each vs jQuery.each vs. for loop vs. `Lo-Dash.each' (v188)

Revision 188 of this benchmark created by Jack on

Description

Added Lo-Dash

Preparation HTML

<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js">
</script>

<script src="//documentcloud.github.com/underscore/underscore-min.js">
</script>
<script>
window.underscore = _.noConflict();
</script>
<script src="https://raw.github.com/bestiejs/lodash/master/lodash.min.js">
</script>
<script>
window.lodash = _.noConflict();
</script>

Setup

var $ = window.$,
        lodash = window.lodash,
        underscore = window.underscore;
    
    var a = [],
        newArray = [],
        pi = Math.PI;
    
    for (var i = 1, max= 100 ; i <= max ; i++) {
      a.push('Fundamental alert number ' + i);
    }

Test runner

Ready to run.

Testing in
TestOps/sec
jQuery.each
$.each(a, function(index, val) {
  newArray.push(val);
});
ready
good old for loop
for (var i = 0, len = a.length; i < len; i++) {
  newArray.push(
    a[i]
  );
}
ready
underscore.each
underscore.each(a, function(item) {
  newArray.push(
    item
  );
});
ready
Lo-Dash each
lodash.each(a, function(item) {
  newArray.push(
    item
  );
});
ready
underscore(a).each
underscore(a).each(function(item) {
  newArray.push(
    item
  );
});
ready
good old for loop ++
for (var b = a[0], len = a.length; len; b = a[--len]) {
  newArray.push(
    b
  );
}
ready
Jack's way, arrr!
var i = 0, len = a.length;
while (i != len) {
  newArray.push(a[i++]);
}
ready

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.