Native bind vs jQuery.proxy vs Underscore bind (v20)

Revision 20 of this benchmark created on

Preparation HTML

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js">
</script>
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.3.3/underscore-min.js">
</script>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/mootools/1.3/mootools-yui-compressed.js"></script>
<script src="https://d14ac9rbwzfcvh.cloudfront.net/javascriptsdk/evo-2/evo.min.js"></script>

Test runner

Ready to run.

Testing in
TestOps/sec
Native bind
var foo = (function(x) {
  return this + x;
}).bind(1);
foo(1);
ready
jQuery.proxy
var foo = jQuery.proxy(function(x) {
  return this + x;
}, 1);
foo(1);
ready
Underscore.js bind
var foo = _.bind(function(x) {
  return this + x;
}, 1);
foo(1)
ready
Without bind
var bar = function(x) {
  return this + x;
};
var foo = function(x) {
  bar.call(1, x);
}
foo(1);
ready
MooTools bind
var foo = function(x) {
  return this + x;
}.bind(1);
foo(1)
ready
Evo Ygloo
var foo = _$Y.gloo(function(x) {
  return this + x;
},1);
foo(1)
ready
Evo Bind
var foo = _$Y.bind(function(x) {
  return this + x;
},1);
foo(1)
ready

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.