Native bind vs jQuery.proxy vs Underscore bind (v47)

Revision 47 of this benchmark created on

Preparation HTML

<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/underscore.js/1.6.0/underscore-min.js"></script>
<script src="//cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/2.4.1/lodash.min.js"></script>
<script>
 var lodash = _.noConflict();
</script>

Test runner

Ready to run.

Testing in
TestOps/sec
Native bind
var foo = (function(x) {
  return this + x;
}).bind(1);
var sum;
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
  sum += foo(i);
foo(sum);
ready
jQuery.proxy
var foo = jQuery.proxy(function(x) {
  return this + x;
}, 1);
var sum;
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
  sum += foo(i);
foo(sum);
ready
Underscore.js bind
var foo = _.bind(function(x) {
  return this + x;
}, 1);
var sum;
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
  sum += foo(i);
foo(sum);
ready
Without bind
var bar = function(x) {
  return this + x;
};
var foo = function(x) {
  bar.call(1, x);
}
var sum;
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
  sum += foo(i);
foo(sum);
ready
Lo-Dash bind
var foo = lodash.bind(function(x) {
  return this + x;
}, 1);
var sum;
for (var i = 0; i < 1000; ++i)
  sum += foo(i);
foo(sum);
ready

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.