function vs jquery extend vs object prototype (v7)

Revision 7 of this benchmark created by emi on

Description

In FF3.6/Win, the execution part (the function calls) have nearly identical running times, so I included the function declarations themselves in the test cases.

Preparation HTML

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://base2.googlecode.com/svn/version/1.0.2/src/base2.js"></script>
<script>
extend = function(first, second){
    for (var prop in second){
        first[prop] = second[prop];
    }
};
other_object = {};
</script>

Test runner

Ready to run.

Testing in
TestOps/sec
function foo()
function aFoo() {
 var x;
 for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
  x = Math.random();
 }
}
aFoo();
ready
var bar = function()
var aBar = function() {
 var x;
 for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
  x = Math.random();
 }
};
aBar();
ready
$.extend
$.extend({
 aBaz: function() {
  var x;
  for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
   x = Math.random();
  }
 }
});
$.aBaz();
ready
Object.prototype
Object.prototype.aQuux = function() {
 var x;
 for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
  x = Math.random();
 }
};
var obj = {};
obj.aQuux();
ready
plain code
var x;
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
 x = Math.random();
}
ready
custom extend
var obj = {};
extend(obj, {
 aBaz: function() {
  var x;
  for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
   x = Math.random();
  }
 }
});
obj.aBaz();
ready
Base2.extend
base2.extend({
 aBaz: function() {
  var x;
  for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
   x = Math.random();
  }
 }
});
base2.aBaz();
ready
$.extend on other object than $
$.extend(other_object,{myBar: function(){
var x;
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
 x = Math.random();
}
}});
other_object.myBar();
ready

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.