jsPerf.app is an online JavaScript performance benchmark test runner & jsperf.com mirror. It is a complete rewrite in homage to the once excellent jsperf.com now with hopefully a more modern & maintainable codebase.
jsperf.com URLs are mirrored at the same path, e.g:
https://jsperf.com/negative-modulo/2
Can be accessed at:
https://jsperf.app/negative-modulo/2
Is it faster to use the native forEach or just loop with for?
Inspired by Adrian Sutton's tests at: http://www.symphonious.net/2010/10/09/javascript-performance-for-vs-foreach/
This one adds random floating point numbers to see if the loop overhead is significant at all in the face of standard work.
var i,
value,
length,
values = [],
sum = 0,
context = values;
for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
values[i] = Math.random();
}
function add(val) {
sum += val;
}
function addEach(k, val) {
sum += val;
}
var toString = Object.prototype.toString;
function isArray(obj) {
return toString.call(obj) === '[object Array]';
}
function isObject(obj) {
return toString.call(obj) === '[object Object]';
}
function isString(obj) {
return toString.call(obj) === '[object String]';
}
function each(obj, iterator) {
var key, length;
if (!obj) {
return;
}
length = obj.length;
if (isArray(obj) || isString(obj)) {
for(key = 0; key < length; key += 1) {
iterator(obj[key], key, obj);
}
return obj;
}
if (isObject(obj)) {
for(key in obj) {
if (obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
iterator(obj[key], key, obj);
}
}
return obj;
}
return obj;
};
function each1 (data, iterator) {
var i,
length = data.length;
for (i = 0; i < length; i += 1) {
iterator(data[i], i, data);
}
}
function each2 (data, iterator) {
var i,
length = data.length;
for (i = 0; i < length; ++i) {
iterator(data[i], i, data);
}
}
i = 0;
value = 0;
length = 0;
values = [];
sum = 0;
Ready to run.
Test | Ops/sec | |
---|---|---|
strict 0 comparison |
| ready |
for loop, cached length, callback |
| ready |
for loop, cached length, callback, reduce op |
| ready |
new each |
| ready |
without strict zero comparison |
| ready |
each1 |
| ready |
each2 |
| ready |
You can edit these tests or add more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.