for vs forEach (v38)

Revision 38 of this benchmark created by Sujay on

Description

Is it faster to use the native forEach or just loop with for?

Inspired by Adrian Sutton's tests at: http://www.symphonious.net/2010/10/09/javascript-performance-for-vs-foreach/

This one adds random floating point numbers to see if the loop overhead is significant at all in the face of standard work.

Preparation HTML

<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js">
</script>

Setup

var i,
        value,
        length,
        values = [],
        sum = 0,
        context = values;
    
    
    for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
        values[i] = Math.random();
    }
    
    function add(val) {
        sum += val;
    }

Teardown


    i = 0;
    value = 0;
    length = 0;
    values = [];
    sum = 0;

Test runner

Ready to run.

Testing in
TestOps/sec
forEach
values.forEach(add);
ready
for loop, simple
for (i = 0; i < values.length; i++) {
    sum += values[i];
}
ready
for loop, cached length
length = values.length;
for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
    sum += values[i];
}
ready
for loop, reverse
for (i = values.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
    sum += values[i];
}
ready
for loop, cached length, callback
length = values.length;
for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
    add(values[i], i, values);
}
ready
for loop, cached length, callback.call
length = values.length;
for (i = 0; i < length; i++) {
    add.call(context, values[i], i, values);
}
ready
$.each
$.each(values, function(key, value) {
    sum += value;
});
ready
for ... in
for (i in values) {
    sum += values[i];
}
ready
for loop, reverse, decrement condition
for (i = values.length; i--;) {
    sum += values[i];
}
ready
for loop, reverse, pre-decrement
for (i = values.length - 1; i >= 0; --i) {
    sum += values[i];
}
ready
for loop, assignment condition
for (i = 0; (value = values[i]) !== undefined; i++) {
    sum += value;
}
ready
for loop, assignment condition, reversed
for (i = values.length - 1; (value = values[i]) !== undefined; i--) {
    sum += value;
}
ready
for loop, assignment condition, callback
for (i = 0; (value = values[i]) !== undefined; i++) {
    add(value, i, values);
}
ready
for loop, assignment condition, callback.call
for (i = 0; (value = values[i]) !== undefined; i++) {
    add.call(context, value, i, values);
}
ready
native map function
values.map(add);
ready

Revisions

You can edit these tests or add more tests to this page by appending /edit to the URL.